The first conclusion is that this work must be based on real, public and verifiable facts, and cannot be steadily quoted by adding labels or repeating keywords. The first step is to distinguish between the search for reptiles and the answer system around the server log? The first step is to place the separation between the search for reptiles and the answer system in the complete process of capturing render and index control. The User-Agent in the log is only a clue, and is subject to verification in relation to the official IP scope, access path and frequency. OpenAI distinguishes OAI-SearchBot, GPTBot and the user-triggered ChatGPT-User, with different uses and robots. This means that the page should draw clear conclusions for the user and allow the grabper to access the same information and keep the source, condition and update time.
The answer system is not able to use the text it cannot reach in a stable manner. The initial HTML, state code, link, regular web site and rendering resources determine whether the page can be found; the technical check must be based on actual capture results, rather than only on a browser display. If the head of the business is involved, the person in charge confirms the facts, the content person is responsible for the expression, the technical person is responsible for the output and index, and the sales person is able to provide feedback to the client. Anyone who finds old data should be able to locate the unified source of facts.
Read and accept. More public reptile instructions, IP information and actual requests, excluding forgery of User-Agent.
In addition, when it comes to customer information, business secrets, certifications and prices, it should be made public with the approval of the responsible official. The final conclusions should be clearly classified as retention, local optimization, suspension or expansion, and should state which assumption is to be verified in the next round.
