This question is appropriate to be judged by the three tiers of “input, execute, evidence”. The first rule is that the catalogue of true task and version control should be set as the main area.
In the real project, when multiple directories are listed together, it is found that the configuration usually differs from the Git operation. If you read only the completion statements in the chat without checking the file and command evidence, the problem can easily be taken to the next stage.
What can be confirmed from the official document is not the secret of the guaranteed result, but the conditions for its operation. The Codex IDE extension is suitable for focused modifications around the files and symbols opened in the editor, while the dependency relationship should still be confirmed through a warehouse search.
The minimum step is to be implemented: identify each directory use, use the main repository as a starting point, and other information as a read-only context. Every step retains the command, version and result, and any irregularity stops at the current level.
It is recommended that the baseline be recorded before the change, and that the change be accompanied by the same conditions to check whether the Git state, the command discovery and the search range are in line with expectations.
If there are installed pages, error pages and case pages on the subject, the current article can be used to explain the main problem and then connect to the next step through descriptive anchor text to avoid multiple pages competing for the same search.
In order to enable the Codex Multi Catalogue project to be reproduced by another member, the mission record contains at least four check points: PRIMARY, SECONDARY, GIT, SCOPE. These English labels can also be used for branch, log or board search.
A Qualifying Duplicate answers two questions at the same time: whether to “check whether Git states, command detections and search ranges meet expectations” and whether there is a “possible change in the wrong copy of the backup directory to the main directory.” The former decides whether to continue and the latter decides to suspend, roll back or to supplement the authorization.
For non-technical users, the delivery notes should be separated from “modified” “executed inspection” “unvalidated matters” and avoid considering the technical log as the final result.
Finally, do not ignore a person ' s judgement. Setting the backup directory as a master directory may change on the wrong copy. Codex can execute and verify, but it cannot be a substitute for the operator to determine the scope and risk tolerance.
