Which core indicators should be selected for the SEO statements
POST

Which core indicators should be selected for the SEO statements

The core indicators that should be selected around the SEO statements are the basis for judgement, implementation methods, validation indicators and common risks, helping to achieve more stable capture, capture and effective natural flow.

First, there is a conclusion that indicators should be disaggregated by visibility, access, participation, transformation and income, and by brand and non-brand. This is also the most important analysis when dealing with “the core indicators to be selected for the SEO statement.” Ranking and traffic are intermediate signals, and the business website will measure access and actual final performance.

SEO报表应该选择哪些核心指标技术示意图,展示可见性、合格流量、询盘、技术健康
Figure 91 Core indicators to be selected in the SEO statement: implementation matrix

The actual execution can start with a small sample. Create a search display, natural click, focus page coverage, a valid query, opportunity amount and technical health board, indicating the data calibre.

The receipt and inspection cannot remain on the business pages. On a monthly basis, the trends and target gaps are reviewed whether the indicators remain in line with the operational objectives on a quarterly basis. Quantitative and quality indicators need to be accompanied by change orders: the former describes coverage, while the latter indicates whether the visits address the problem and bring about an effective next step.

The most vulnerable pits are: the number of articles published or the total number of keywords used as the main achievement, which can easily encourage low-quality expansion. Therefore, conditions of application, responsible persons and cessation rules should be stated before release; stabilization should be restored in the event of an anomaly, and analysis should continue on the basis of logbooks, capture of final performance and operational data.

This process does not require a complete re-entry station. The selection of a representative set of business pages to be tested, to observe a full capture and transformation cycle, and then to consolidate the validated rules into CMS, cross-certification forms and monthly discs, usually has a more reliable long-term effect than a temporary surprise.

In order to prevent the conclusion from remaining in the report, it is recommended that the visible and technical health be issued as an acceptance item and that the anomaly be analysed and repaired for how long. This way the new business page follows the same standard and the old business page can be detected in a timely manner after the template changes.

Related content