Will too many footers affect the structure of the site?
POST

Will too many footers affect the structure of the site?

Do too many footer links affect the structure of the website, providing a clear basis for judgement, implementation methods, validation indicators and common risks, and helping to achieve more stable access, capture and effective natural flow.

To judge whether too many foot-legging links affect the structure of the website, three anomalies can be asked first: whether the target URL is clear, whether the retrieval system has steady access and whether the user has the expected answers. Footer is suitable for a stable company, policy, and priority entry, and not for the hundreds of keyword links. None of the three anomalies is valid and does not urgently expand.

页脚链接过多会影响网站结构吗技术示意图,展示稳定入口、模板噪声、精简、可用性
Figure 26: Too many foot-links affecting the structure of the website: implementation matrix

Repeating links across the station magnifies the noise of the template and is not a substitute for the relevant link in the text. It is therefore not appropriate for the audit to export only a list of errors in the tool, but rather to treat each anomaly with an impact template, business value, repair cost and validation method, first to deal with blockage anomalies.

In the case of old systems that cannot be immediately modified, the risk can be controlled with the least feasible option, while the underlying repairs are added to the development plan.

The results review uses a sample of the same content pages: comparison of availability, reptile paths and internal sources of links to the core content pages before and after the footer has been streamlined. It also registers cases that have not improved, which often reveal rule exceptions or data calibre anomalies. The deletion of all footer navigation can also undermine access to support, distinguishing between links to service users and pure SEO stacks, so any batch operation should first be validated on the test environment and on a small number of URLs.

In order to prevent the conclusion from remaining in the report, it is recommended that the stable entry and usability be published as acceptance items and that the anomaly be judged by whom and how long it will be repaired. This way, the new content page follows the same standard and the old content page can be detected in a timely manner after the template has been changed.

When you actually repeat a disk, you may choose a successful content page and a failed content page in parallel. It is easier to register their entry, content difference, capture status and transformation effects around foot-to-foot links to form the next clear set of actions than by looking at the average of the entire site.

Related content