Instead of expanding a large number of pages at one time, a representative page should be used to validate the results of the logs, indexes, citations and queries to determine whether to copy them. “How do brand names in different languages remain the same?” First, the brand names in different languages should be consistently placed back into the full process of “multilingual and localization.” Different languages can use market-customary branding, but they should be clearly linked to legal subjects and main brands, and should remain stable in the Organization node, Logo and official links. This means that the page must be clear to the user, as well as allow the grabper to obtain the same information and retain the source, condition and update time.
The focus of the multilingual GEO is to make each language version both stand-alone and capable of being identified as a corresponding version of the same brand or content. Localization must reflect differences in markets, units, regulations and procurement practices. When resources are limited, priority should be given to addressing those aspects that impede capture, create factual conflicts or mislead procurement.
A high-value page can be selected for the pilot: a baseline is maintained after the official names of the languages have been identified, an alias and the main entity are mapped, a full cycle is observed, and an interactive checklist is formed with synchronized footers, information about us and the social media.
It is recommended that a comparison be made between the name, logo, address, and official account numbers on and off the site. The first round confirms that the technology is being implemented correctly, the second round looks at continuous trends, and then evaluates the impact on the Queries and offers. If there is a conflict or a citation error after implementation, the latest version should be checked. Teams translate their own brand names into multiple identities.
