What should AGENTS.md write?
POST

What should AGENTS.md write?

Help teams to establish a reversible and reviewable Cordex usage process around “what should be written by AGENTS.md” to describe the conditions of application, the method of implementation, the proof and the risk boundary.

全局AGENTS.md应该写哪些内容相关技术流程图,图中文字为英文
Figure 21 What AGENTS.md should write: a technical implementation diagram

First, it is concluded that the global directive retains only working habits and security constraints that are stable across projects.

The reason for the error on this subject is that the inclusion of project-specific rules in a global document would contaminate other warehouses. First, Codex would know what can be implemented directly and what must be stopped to confirm by separating facts, assumptions and authorizations.

OpenAI Docs provides the current boundary for the topic. Codex will read AGENTS.md or overwhelm files from the global to the current project directory, and the closer the rules of the work directory will be placed in the group command. The actual project will still need to be validated with the version and organizational strategy.

The card lists the objects, permissions, input and acceptance, and then executes: it contains the generic test preferences, communication and destructive operational boundaries, leaving the project order to the warehouse file.

The team board records the type of task, time-consuming and back-to-work, while at the same time asking the source of the current command in different warehouses to confirm that there was no wrong succession, so that it can distinguish between speed and quality decline.

If there are installed pages, error pages and case pages on the subject, the current article can be used to explain the main problem and then connect to the next step through descriptive anchor text to avoid multiple pages competing for the same search.

To enable Codex's global instructions to be reproduced by another member, the mission record contains at least four check points: GLOBAL, DEFAULTS, SAFETY, SCOPE. These are also available for branch, log or board search.

A Qualifying Repository responds to two questions at the same time: whether it is possible “to ask the source of the current command in different warehouses to confirm that there is no wrong succession” and whether there is “an excessively long global rule that conflicts with the project's requirements and takes precedence over the context.” The former decides whether to continue, while the latter decides whether to suspend, roll back or to supplement the authorization.

When multiple people work together, configurations, scripts and rules should be subject to reviewable version control; confidential and personal authentication information is kept in a controlled environment and not duplicated with the project.

Safety and efficiency are not the alternative. Excessive global rules conflict with project requirements and take their context; waiting and accident can be reduced at the same time through minimal authority, clear objectives and automatic validation.

Related content