Many of the apparent content problems are rooted in the lack of uniformity of market, evidence, and follow-up standards. In the case of “how the five-axis processing capacity is a short video that buyers can understand,” the French equipment maintenance manager will not enter the procurement process because the post is good, and he will need to confirm the suitability of the product and the credibility of the supplier within a limited period of time.
Scripts should not start with company presentations, but should begin with work or results; they should then be followed by a key action, a testable detail and a clear entry point. The tester should not ask “what a good look”, but the tester should find out a fact, a limit and an entry point; what is not found is the next round of changes. The team can start by collating the existing material, removing the unverifiable slogans, and then re-organizing the manufacturing capacity to the buyer's quality risk and supply stability by “eviding evidence around a public transport, material, process, testing and transfer period”.
When it is completed, the conclusions will be returned to the content library and the action portal will be unified as “arranged video labs”, and the next project of the same kind will be able to re-use the validated section directly.
Double-checking also involves checking drawings for evaluation, test reports, batch records and application samples to match each other and recording exceptions separately to avoid a random query as a general rule.
